![]() However, this doesn’t work if the micro-shakes are to strong or if the movements of the image otherwise are to heavy. When the resulting image gives a exaggerated “rubbery” or “wavy” characteristic, lower Strong to 80 or 70 until the image stabilises and looks more natural, but don’t change Smooth, with a few exceptions. I found a working formula of the setting of Strong and Smooth to effectively eradicade micro-shakes to the camera: Always begin with setting Strong to 90 and Smooth to 10. I probably will learn the difference between the two over the years, but perhaps some of you more experienced may share a though or two on this subject matter? Some shots in my project work better with a higher Strong and others with a higher Smooth level, but I haven't figuered out why yet.Īny clues on this matter? Do you, based on your experience with Resolve, have any recommendations what particular kind of shaky footage is best dealt with Strong and what footage is best dealt with Smooth, or a somewhat equal combination of the two? ![]() To be honest, I have nor real clue what the actual difference is between Strong and Smooth, what the difference is between camera movement and camera wiggling. #Davinci resolve stabilize title cropping manualIv'e read the parts in the manual which deals with Strong and Smooth, and have understood that Strong controls camera movements and Smooth.eh, something like smoothness to the camera movement, such as wiggling or some sort of thing. I'm working around to stabilize shaky handheld footage. ![]() I used a simple pistol grip / shoulder brace combo rig for my Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera for handheld shots. I'm new to DaVinci Resolve and am currently working on my first project, a camera test movie. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |